Chanel
I have a kind of love hate relationship with this collection. It's weird but I think when I actually look at the clothes, I find them very beautiful. But when I look at them in the context of a show, I find the whole thing quite well, boring. I guess I have a problem with the whole gimmick of Antarctica in the show. I mean the set was amazing, but personally I found it quite excessive for a 15 minute ready to wear show. I love it but it's just so well... huge. I guess that is what fashion is about though, excess. But I think what really annoyed me about this particular presentation, was how everyone put a label on it as being a Climate Change awareness thing. I mean Karl may be a genius but if he is putting his name to this 'being green' thing I may have to smite him with his own knuckle duster-ed fist. I mean the 30 tonnes (although other sources said 265 tonnes) of ice that they/he trucked in from Sweden must have used that in diesel and petrol. In the interview after the show on the Chanel website, Karl says he "...[has] no idea how many trucks [were used to transport the ice in pieces, to the show]..." All I can gather is that the blocks that stood 28 metres high when fully assembled, has probably caused a small hole in the ozone, a family in some third world country left in poverty, a plague of rats and locusts and spread misery and disease throughout the world. And other bad stuff to do with the earth's magnetic field and misbehaving dishwashers. Ok maybe not but it sure hasn't helped the world with it's err... problems. I think the most annoying comment I've heard throughout this whole thing is a smug journalist commenting in one of the interviews "It's Karl's say on climate change." or now this is good, "With global warming, ice-bergs melting and global catastrophe looms. But for Chanel's Karl Largerfeld, that's no excuse not to look ones best." I mean WAT??? Your fashion blog (naming no names) just made fashion sound stupid, and like people think it is saving the world. Not an incredible art form that people invented to use for entertainment and ENJOYMENT. In fact I think that last statement confirmed for all sceptics on the fashion industry, the beliefs that ALL people interested in fashion think it's like a cure for cancer or something. But although I hate this stereotype of the fashion industry, I think for some unfortunate people it is true. I think there comes a point in the life of a person working in the rag trade, were the lines blur between what is important and what is frivolous fun. Maybe they need a government system where all people applying for a job in fashion, must wear some kind of ankle band like pigeons do. Then a small electric shock would be welcome from the band, after the sensor senses a rise in pretension levels in the brain. To do this though you would probably have to have it attached to the head... but then it would be really ugly... maybe Karl or Marc could make personalised one's... I wonder if they would make matching ones for pigeons...

SHUT UP BRAIN!!! anyway back to the clothes. In the collection, all the fur was surprisingly fake. (Although Karl insists that it should be called costume fur, because the term fake is derogative. I think this is actually quite true.) Which is quite a big deal for Chanel's luxury image. I think in the end, all those PETA activists got to Karl and he was somehow convinced by his advisors or something that it would be better for his popularity bla bla bla. And now, prepare for the knowledge of your life. Stufflike this only comes round once a day!!!...
Interesting fact of the day - Pidgeons evolved millions of years ago in Asia!!!
Oh and most of Chanel's tweeds are embroidered on.